Posted at 26 February 2018

When conducted properly, palatability testing is a useful scientific and marketing tool pet food manufacturers can rely on to make strategic decisions. However, the risk of generating false conclusions from palatability trials exists due to biases that can appear if protocols and panels are not properly controlled.

Diana Pet Food's experts in palatability measurement have established several good practices to avoid measurement biases. They include the careful qualification of the animals, the perfect control of testing conditions (time, duration, ration...), but also the respect of animal well-being. Indeed, representative and reliable answers can only be obtained with healthy, happy and unstressed pets!

 

Authors: Christelle Tobie - Panelis Business Development Manager @Diana Pet Food - & Claire Larose Forges - Ethologist @Diana Pet Food

Want to know more about this publication? Contact us here

Receive our White paper

  • You may change your preferences at any time by clicking here

Discover other publications on this topic

Scientific publication - Palatability, Measurement

Food preference and olfactory discrimination in dogs

Discrimination and preference are not the same! Dogs can distinguish foods by olfaction and express the same preference for products with different odors.

Read more

Scientific poster - Measurement

Missing data in palatability trials

Learn how to deal with missing data in palatability tests through a case study with external preference mapping

Download