Posted at 01 June 2018

In order to guide their developments and ensure successful launches, pet food manufacturers need a reliable evaluation of their products’ performance. Palatability assessment tests are classically run in pet centers with expert and semi-expert panels or in an in-home environment with owner’s pets. In this study Diana Pet Food's experts in palatability measurement evaluated the consistency of answers obtained when testing the same cat foods in these three types of panels with 2-bowls methodology.

Results demonstrated that palatability answers can be highly variable depending on the type of panel used. Answers obtained in expert panels are usually more accurate, especially when small differences between products are compared. This variation can be due to the lack of environment control in in-home conditions but also to panel feeding history.

Authors: L Le Paih, C Forges-Larose, C Tobie, E Mehinagic @Diana Pet Food, Elven, France

Results presented at Sensometrics 2016 - Pet Food Forum US 2016 - Pangborn 2015

Want to know more about this poster? Contact us here

Receive our Scientific poster

  • You may change your preferences at any time by clicking here

Discover other publications on this topic

Scientific publication - Palatability, Measurement

Food preference and olfactory discrimination in dogs

Discrimination and preference are not the same! Dogs can distinguish foods by olfaction and express the same preference for products with different odors.

Read more

Scientific poster - Measurement

Missing data in palatability trials

Learn how to deal with missing data in palatability tests through a case study with external preference mapping